Buy Me a Coffee
Home
Created by Claudiu Tabac - © 2026
This material is open for educational and research use. Commercial use without explicit permission from the author is not allowed.
SCC-11: Backup, Restoration & Continuity
Defining how organizations ensure availability, recoverability, and operational continuity in the face of system failure, data loss, cyber incidents, or external disruption.
The Enterprise Security Imperative
SCC-11 defines how the organization ensures availability, recoverability, and operational continuity in the face of system failure, data loss, cyber incidents, or external disruption. This cluster determines whether resilience is designed, tested, and governed-or merely assumed until failure occurs.
Organizations that treat backup as a technical afterthought discover too late that restoration failures cascade into business-critical disruptions, regulatory penalties, and permanent reputational damage.
Critical Data Recovery
Systems must be recoverable within defined timeframes
Tested Capabilities
Restoration procedures validated through regular exercises
Risk-Based Governance
Resilience decisions aligned with business criticality
Purpose of SCC-11
The purpose of SCC-11 is to ensure that organizations maintain genuine operational resilience rather than documenting theoretical recovery capabilities that fail under real-world conditions.
Critical data and systems are recoverable
Recovery mechanisms exist for all assets where data loss would create unacceptable business impact, regulatory violation, or operational disruption.
Restoration capabilities are tested and reliable
Recovery procedures are validated through regular testing that simulates realistic failure scenarios and proves actual restoration within defined timeframes.
Business continuity plans reflect real dependencies
Continuity strategies account for actual system interdependencies, resource requirements, and operational constraints rather than idealized assumptions.
Resilience decisions are governed and risk-based
Backup coverage, recovery objectives, and continuity investments align with business risk tolerance and regulatory obligations through formal governance.

Critical Insight: Without proven recovery capability, availability is an illusion. Organizations must demonstrate restoration readiness before disruption occurs, not discover gaps during crisis response.
Data Backup Strategy & Coverage
This capability area examines whether backup is intentional, complete, and aligned with business criticality rather than applied inconsistently based on technical convenience or outdated assumptions.
Effective backup strategy requires systematic identification of what must be protected, how frequently protection occurs, and how long backup data remains available for restoration. Organizations must establish clear governance for backup exceptions, ensuring that gaps in coverage result from conscious risk acceptance rather than oversight.
Strategic Backup Principles
  • Identification of data and systems requiring backup based on business impact analysis
  • Defined backup frequency, retention periods, and scope aligned with recovery objectives
  • Protection of backups against loss, corruption, or compromise through segregation and security controls
  • Formal governance of backup exceptions with documented risk acceptance
Coverage Assessment
Systematic inventory of critical data and systems mapped to backup requirements
Schedule Definition
Backup frequency and retention aligned with recovery point objectives
Protection Controls
Backup data secured against unauthorized access and destructive attacks
Exception Governance
Formal process for evaluating and accepting backup coverage gaps
Backups must exist where loss is unacceptable-not where it is convenient.
Restoration & Recovery Capability
This capability area focuses on whether the organization can restore systems and data within acceptable timeframes when disruption occurs. Having backups is insufficient without validated ability to recover from them.
01
Define Recovery Objectives
Establish Recovery Time Objectives (RTO) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) based on business impact and regulatory requirements
02
Document Procedures
Create detailed restoration procedures with step-by-step guidance, required tools, and dependency requirements
03
Assign Responsibilities
Designate recovery roles with clear ownership, escalation paths, and decision-making authority
04
Validate Dependencies
Identify and verify all technical, process, and resource dependencies required for successful restoration
Recovery Time Objectives
RTO defines the maximum acceptable downtime for a system or process. Organizations must establish RTOs based on business impact analysis, ensuring that recovery capabilities can meet these targets under realistic conditions.
Recovery Point Objectives
RPO defines the maximum acceptable data loss measured in time. RPOs drive backup frequency requirements and determine how much transaction data can be lost without creating unacceptable business consequences.

Critical Principle: Restoration capability must be proven, not presumed. Documented procedures without validation testing create false confidence that collapses during actual recovery attempts.
Backup Integrity & Security
This capability area evaluates how backups are protected and trusted as the foundation for recovery. Compromised or corrupted backups eliminate recovery options precisely when they're most needed.
Encryption & Access Control
Backup data protected through encryption at rest and in transit, with strict access controls limiting who can view or modify backup content
Ransomware Protection
Backup systems hardened against ransomware and destructive attacks through immutable storage, air-gapped copies, and multi-factor authentication
Environment Segregation
Backup infrastructure logically and physically separated from production systems to prevent simultaneous compromise
Success Monitoring
Continuous monitoring of backup operations with alerting for failures, anomalies, and integrity verification results
Threat Landscape
Modern ransomware specifically targets backup systems to eliminate recovery options. Protection strategies must assume attackers will attempt to compromise or encrypt backup data.
Integrity Validation
Regular integrity checks verify that backup data remains uncorrupted and complete. Validation includes cryptographic verification and sample restoration testing.
Access Governance
Backup access follows least-privilege principles with detailed logging. Administrative access requires approval workflows and periodic recertification.
Compromised backups eliminate recovery options. Security controls protecting backup data are as critical as the backup process itself.
Business Continuity Planning
This capability area examines how continuity is planned across processes, people, and technology to maintain critical business functions during disruption.
Process Identification
Critical business processes identified through systematic analysis of operational dependencies and impact thresholds
Continuity Plans
Detailed continuity plans aligned with asset dependencies, recovery priorities, and resource availability
IT-Business Coordination
Integrated coordination between IT recovery procedures and business continuity activities
Assumption Governance
Formal validation of continuity assumptions against operational reality and resource constraints
Operational Dependencies
Effective continuity planning requires deep understanding of how business processes depend on systems, data, people, facilities, and third parties. Plans must account for cascading failures where disruption in one area creates downstream impacts across multiple business functions.
Dependency mapping goes beyond documenting technical relationships to include:
  • Supplier and vendor dependencies
  • Key personnel and skill requirements
  • Facility and infrastructure needs
  • Regulatory and compliance obligations
Reality Testing
Business continuity plans frequently contain unstated assumptions about resource availability, communication channels, or decision-making authority that prove invalid during actual disruption.
Governance mechanisms must challenge and validate assumptions including:
  • Alternative facility readiness and capacity
  • Workforce availability during crisis
  • Communication system reliability
  • Third-party performance commitments

Essential Truth: Continuity planning must reflect operational reality, not idealized assumptions. Plans that ignore practical constraints fail when stress-tested by actual disruption.
Testing, Exercises & Continuous Improvement
This capability area focuses on whether backup and continuity capabilities are tested and improved over time through structured validation and learning cycles.
1
Restoration Testing
Regular validation of restoration procedures across representative systems and data sets, measuring actual recovery time against objectives
2
Continuity Exercises
Tabletop exercises and simulations testing business continuity plans under realistic failure scenarios
3
Lessons Learned
Systematic capture and analysis of testing results, exercise outcomes, and actual incident experiences
4
Remediation Tracking
Formal tracking of identified gaps with assigned ownership, target completion dates, and progress monitoring
5
Management Review
Regular executive review of resilience readiness including testing results, gap remediation, and capability maturity
Testing Maturity Progression
Component Testing
Individual backup and restoration procedures validated in isolation
Integrated Testing
End-to-end recovery scenarios including dependencies and coordination points
Full-Scale Exercises
Comprehensive simulations involving business units, IT teams, and management decision-making
Untested recovery plans fail under pressure. Organizations must validate capabilities through rigorous testing before disruption occurs, not discover gaps during crisis response.
Regulatory & Assurance Framework Alignment
SCC-11 is central to frameworks addressing availability, resilience, and operational continuity. Regulatory and assurance requirements evaluate whether organizations can contain and recover from disruption.
ISO/IEC 27001
Controls A.12.3 (Backup) and A.17.1 (Business Continuity) require documented procedures, regular testing, and management review of information backup and continuity planning.
NIS2 Directive
Articles 21-22 mandate business continuity, backup management, and disaster recovery capabilities with specific requirements for essential and important entities.
DORA
Articles 11-12 establish comprehensive operational resilience requirements including backup policies, recovery testing, and business continuity management for financial entities.
SOC 2 Type II
Availability criteria CC9.1 and A1.2 require documented backup procedures, regular testing, and continuous monitoring with evidence of operational effectiveness over time.
Cross-Framework Themes
Despite differences in scope and terminology, regulatory frameworks converge on core expectations:
  • Systematic identification of critical assets
  • Risk-based recovery objectives
  • Regular testing and validation
  • Documented evidence of capability
  • Management oversight and accountability
Compliance Integration
Organizations meeting SCC-11 requirements establish capabilities that satisfy multiple regulatory obligations simultaneously, reducing duplication while improving actual resilience readiness.
Evidence & Failure Modes
Evidence Perspective
Evidence supporting SCC-11 demonstrates real recovery capability, not just documented intent. Effective evidence proves operational readiness through artifacts showing actual testing, validation, and continuous improvement.
Representative Evidence
Backup policies and coverage reports
Documented strategies with current inventories showing protected systems and data
Restoration test results
Test reports with timing metrics, success rates, and identified issues
Business continuity and disaster recovery plans
Current plans with defined procedures, roles, and dependencies
Exercise reports and remediation actions
Exercise outcomes with tracked improvements and closed findings
Failure Mode Perspective
Common failure modes associated with SCC-11 represent gaps that remain hidden until major incidents expose them. These failures often cascade, amplifying disruption impact.
Critical Failure Patterns
Incomplete or outdated backups
Coverage gaps or stale data discovered during restoration attempts
Recovery plans never tested
Documented procedures that fail when executed under realistic conditions
Misaligned recovery objectives
RTOs and RPOs disconnected from actual business requirements or technical capability
Hidden dependencies preventing restoration
Undocumented requirements discovered only during recovery execution

These failures often surface only during major incidents when recovery capability matters most.
Using SCC-11 Effectively
Use SCC-11 to assess whether resilience is operationally real rather than theoretically documented. This cluster provides a framework for:
Capability Assessment
Evaluate whether backup and continuity capabilities can deliver real recovery within defined timeframes
Risk Alignment
Ensure recovery objectives and continuity investments reflect actual business risk tolerance
Regulatory Interpretation
Map availability requirements across multiple regulatory frameworks to SCC-11 capabilities
Weakness Identification
Identify weak points in backup, restoration, and continuity that amplify disruption impact
SCC-11 ensures that the organization can recover, not just react. Resilience requires proven capability validated through testing, not assumptions documented in untested plans.
Created by Claudiu Tabac — © 2026
This material is open for educational and research use. Commercial use without explicit permission from the author is not allowed.